You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 1033 CRD-1-90-6
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD/DIVISION
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
MARCH 30, 1993
ANDREW SCHICK
CLAIMANT-APPELLANT
v.
WINDSOR AIRMOTIVE DIVISION BARNES GROUP INC.
EMPLOYER
and
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
JOHN ARCUDI, COMMISSIONER. As clearly stated in the second paragraph of the February 16, 1993 Compensation Review Board decision to remand the matter to the First District for further proceedings, those proceedings may be either (1) a trial de novo or (2) “if the parties agree to submit the evidential transcripts and exhibits of the [trial commissioner’s] hearings together with his [the trial commissioner’s] Finding and Award and the claimant’s Motion to Correct to ... [another] Commissioner...for completion....”.
Commissioners Gerald Kolinsky and Angelo L. dos Santos concur.
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |