You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 1888 CRB-1-93-11
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 24, 1995
EVA GRIFFITH-PATTON
CLAIMANT-APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT/DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
EMPLOYER
RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
and
SECOND INJURY FUND
RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
The pro se claimant has filed a Motion for Rectification/Articulation dated October 9, 1995 in conjunction with her appeal to the State of Connecticut Appellate Court. The claimant previously filed a Motion for Rectification /Articulation dated September 11, 1995, in response to which we issued an articulation dated November 22, 1995. This board does not believe that the claimant has raised any meritorious concerns in her second motion, and thus denies the October 9, 1995 Motion for Rectification/ Articulation in its entirety.
Jesse M. Frankl, Chairman
Compensation Review Board
Workers’ Compensation Commission
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |