You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 4232 CRB-4-00-4
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
JANUARY 30, 2002
CARL PUCHALA, JR.
CLAIMANT-APPELLEE
v.
CONNECTICUT ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
EMPLOYER
NO RECORD OF INSURANCE
RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
and
PRAIRIE LAND CONTRACTING
EMPLOYER
and
TRAVELERS PROPERTY & CASUALTY
INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
and
CHERRY HILL CONTRACTORS
EMPLOYER
and
VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE CO./CAN
INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
and
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
EMPLOYER
and
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
and
SECOND INJURY FUND
RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
The respondent employer Connecticut Abatement Technologies has petitioned for review from the April 3, 2000 “Decision Re: Remand from CRB” of the Commissioner acting for the Fourth District. Subsequent to the filing of its appeal, the claimant’s claim was settled pursuant to a Full and Final Stipulation which was approved by the Commissioner acting for the Fourth District on June 26, 2001. As the appeal is now moot, and the respondent appellant has not withdrawn its appeal as requested, we therefore will dismiss the appeal. See Gawlik v. Stanley Hand Tools, 4303 CRB-6-00-10 (June 6, 2001), citing Kovac v. Kecko Piping Company, 3806 CRB-4-98-4 (Oct. 2, 1998); Johnson v. Manchester Bus Service, Inc., 3863 CRB-1-98-8 (Aug. 5, 1998).
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Compensation Review Board
Workers’ Compensation Commission
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |